Commonwealth v. Pettinato
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence for burglary and conspiracy. Appellant contends that (1) the lower court erred in admitting the complainant’s testimony that appellant made an offer of compromise; and (2) the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions. Because these contentions are meritless, we affirm the judgment of sentence.
In March, 1985, appellant was arrested and charged with burglary, conspiracy, and the summary offense of criminal mischief. Following a bench trial, appellant was convicted on all charges. He was sentenced to a three-to-six year…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. MelnyczenkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Durant v. McKelveySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Commonwealth v. LucianoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. TerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- Livingstone v. North Belle Vernon BoroughCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Livingstone v. North Belle Vernon BoroughCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Com. v. Veronikis, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019