Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Social Security Administration

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 22, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2017-2680Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DANIELLE DIANA BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-02680 (CKK) ANDREW SAUL, 1 Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, Danielle Diana Brooks, proceeding pro se, filed suit on December 14, 2017, against Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Defendant now moves to dismiss this matter for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See ECF No. 18. For the reasons stated herein, the Court will grant Defendant’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. James H. Neal v. Sharon Pratt Kelly, MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  3. Thomas C. Fox v. Marion D. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  4. Albert Earle Smith-Bey v. Clair A. Cripe, General Counsel, Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  5. Godesa A. Bomate v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API