United States v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge HAWKINS; Dissent by Judge BERZON.
HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
We primarily consider whether a jury instruction impermissibly relieved the government of its burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant used a “dangerous weapon” and whether any error in the instruction was harmless. A panel of our court held that the jury instruction was not defective and affirmed the defendant’s conviction. United States v. Smith, 520 F.3d 1097 (9th Cir.2008). We subsequently granted rehearing en banc.
Although we hold there was a “reasonable likelihood” the trial judge’s instructions…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Pineda-DovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. AnchrumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. RochaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. ThongsyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.