Stuart v. Stuart

By the Court.

This court has determined that there is prejudicial error in the record in two respects: (1) In refusing to allow additional attorney fees for the plaintiff and (2) in making an order with respect to the sale of the premises, which would deprive the plaintiff of inchoate dower.

During the pendency of the action and before trial the plaintiff, on motion, was allowed the sum of $50 to apply on attorney fees, but when the final judgment was entered, the journal entry recited that “plaintiff is not entitled to the payment of attorney fees.” No-further allowance of fees was ever made.

Th…