Legal Opinion
Monarch Insurance v. Hetherly
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 19, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*595OPINION OF THE COURT
David O. Boehm, J.
Defendant, Elba Air Dusters, obtained an agriplan aerial applicator’s insurance policy from plaintiff, Monarch Insurance Company of Ohio. The policy classified seven types of liability coverage, of which Elba purchased only "Bodily Injury (Excluding passengers and Chemical Liability)” and "Property Damage (Excluding Chemical Liability)” coverage. Chemical liability coverage was available but not purchased by Elba. Defendant, Eugene Hetherly, is the sole shareholder of Elba.
Defendants, Kathleen and John Griffiths, sued Hetherly, Elba, and defendant,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Ruder & Finn Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- International Paper Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Goldberg v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Lionel Freedman, Inc. v. Glens Falls InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- New Hampshire Insurance v. Jefferson InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Bridge Metal Industries, L.L.C. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Monarch Insurance v. HetherlyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Marquis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Marquis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998