Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Laurence Keiswetter

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 4, 1988No. 87-2347Published

1DissentJohn P. Moore, Circuit Judge

I must respectfully dissent from that part of the court’s opinion which holds that North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970), does not require a finding of “strong evidence” to substantiate the guilty plea of a defendant who subsequently protests his innocence. I further disagree with remanding this case for further inquiry. It is my judgment the attempted Alford plea was invalid, and allowing the trial court the opportunity to revitalize it is a post hoc disposition that is unparalleled in our jurisprudence. The plea must be vacated, and the case remanded for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. Edward Lee ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Gert Albertus TheronCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Ivar Q. BlacknerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API