Legal Opinion

Dover Motors Corp. v. North & South Motor Lines, Inc.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided May 15, 1937No. 130Published

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

A judgment entered on a warrant of attorney contained in a note or bond must be in strict conformity with its provisions. Woolley’s Del. Practice, §§ 793, 794, 795.

The note in question was signed

“NORTH & SOUTH MOTOR LINES, INC. (L. S.) “R. E. NORRIS, PRES. (L. S.)”

but it is not claimed that Norris signed it individually, or other than as President of North & South Motor Lines, Inc., the maker. See Rev. Code 1935, §§ 3143, 3144.

The warrant of attorney contained in the note, on *469which the judgment questioned was confessed, provided: “undersigned…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smulski v. H. Feinberg Furniture Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API