Legal Opinion

Sekaly v. Hilton Center, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 18, 1960No. 3785PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*828WILSON, Justice.

Plaintiffs in error were defendants in an action on an itemized verified account, in which plaintiff alternatively sued on quantum meruit. Defendants filed an answer but did not appear when the case was called for trial after setting and notice. Judgment was rendered against them as prayed for.

Points attacking the judgment require a determination of whether there was proof to support it. The record shows evidence was heard. At the request of plaintiffs in error the court filed elaborate findings of fact which support judgment for plaintiff’s claim. The record consists of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Huff v. Fidelity Union Life Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Mays v. PierceTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Edwards Feed Mill, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Griswold v. CarlsonTexas Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harris v. LebowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  2. Redman v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Carr v. Central Music CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Rourk v. Cameron Appraisal District, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  5. Cruz v. First Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API