Legal Opinion

State v. MacDicken

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2014No. 88267-3PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

¶1 When Abraham MacDicken was arrested on suspicion of armed robbery, he was carrying a laptop bag and pushing a rolling duffel bag. The arresting officers moved the bags a car’s length away and searched them. MacDicken claims this search violated his rights under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 7 of the Washington State Constitution. But as this court recently held, officers may search an arrestee’s person and articles closely associated with his or her person at the time of arrest without violating either of those constitutional provisions.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. State v. AfanaWashington Supreme Court · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. BrockWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. VanNessCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. State v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. State v. SamaliaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. State v. VanhollebekeWashington Supreme Court · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API