Legal Opinion

Hill v. Luna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 16, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendants Cronshaw for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint. Plaintiff Elizabeth Hill was injured while a passenger in an automobile driven by defendant Betty M. Cronshaw. Another motorist ran a red light and collided with the Cronshaw vehicle, which was proceeding through a green light at a speed of approximately 15 to 20 miles per hour. The Cronshaws established through the deposition testimony of Betty Cronshaw and Elizabeth Hill that the former "did all that a reasonable person…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Friends of Animals, Inc. v. Associated Fur Manufacturers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Mansfield v. GraffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. Safran v. AmatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bolta v. LohanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Miranda v. DevlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Diasparra v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Ferrara v. MaioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API