Legal Opinion
People v. Cobb
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided December 27, 1996No. 95CA1453Published
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge KAPELKE.
Defendant, Edith Cobb, appearing pro se, appeals from the judgment in favor of the People ordering the forfeiture of certain of her real property and currency pursuant to Colorado’s public nuisance abatement statute, § 16-13-301, et seq., C.R.S. (1996 Cum. Supp.). We affirm.
The People filed a civil complaint against defendant seeking forfeiture of, and a temporary restraining order as to, two parcels of real property and $884 in currency. The complaint was supported by the affidavit of a police detective who described a history of sales and use of crack cocaine on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. 7108 West Grand Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, Feliberto Flores and Isabellita Flores, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- People v. MiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- In Re Marriage of HartleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- United States v. $100,375.00 in U.S. Currency, Curtis McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.