State v. Brady
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The sole issue in this case is whether double jeopardy precludes retrial of the defendants after the trial judge, on his own motion, declared a mistrial before their criminal cases were submitted to the jury. We hold that it does not.
As a result of their participation in a demonstration at the construction site of the Seabrook nuclear power plant, the defendants were charged with criminal trespass under RSA 635:2. A jury trial before Mullavey, J., began on May 7, 1979. After the third day of trial, the judge excused the jury for the day, correctly told the defendants that they would not be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gori v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brady v. SamahaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- State v. CrutchfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Brady v. SamahaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- State v. HartfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989