Eubank v. Ralls's ex'or
Supreme Court of Virginia
There were four cases between these parties, on writs of supersedeas to judgements of the circuit court of Amherst, which being nearly alike in their circumstances, were argued , and considered together- Eubank and two others executed four bonds to Caleb Ralls, all dated the 20th December 1817, and all for the same penal sum of 1548 dollars, with condition, respectively, for the payment of 774 dollars, on or before the 1st day of March in the years 1818, 1819, 1820 and 1821.…
Read the full summary
There were four cases between these parties, on writs of supersedeas to judgements of the circuit court of Amherst, which being nearly alike in their circumstances, were argued , and considered together- Eubank and two others executed four bonds to Caleb Ralls, all dated the 20th December 1817, and all for the same penal sum of 1548 dollars, with condition, respectively, for the payment of 774 dollars, on or before the 1st day of March in the years 1818, 1819, 1820 and 1821. On each of these bonds, there was an indorsement in these words: “ Memorandum—If the within bond is discharged within…
1ConcurrenceCabell, J.
concurred in opinion, that the judgements of the circuit court were erroneous.
In the three first cases, judgements of the circuit court reversed, and those of the county court affirmed—in the last case, judgement of the circuit court reversed, and judgement entered to amend the record of the office judgement, and to quash the execution and proceedings thereon.* *322it a judgement against John Rose and Garland only; and the court ordered yie amendment accordingly. And then, Marx, the appellee, moved this court for a rule to dismiss the appeal, unless another and a proper appeal gj]0Ui,j t,e given…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Beale v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1815