Legal Opinion
Dill v. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided November 1, 1933No. 1455—6135PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHORT, Presiding Judge.
The application for the writ of error in this case was granted because the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals is in direct conflict with the opinions of Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. Durham (Tex. Civ. App.) 222 S. W. 275, and the opinion in Employers’ Casualty Company v. Watson (Tex. Civ. App.) 32 S.W.(2d) 927. The nature and result of the judgment in this case is stated as follows in the application for writ of error:
“The Court of Civil Appeals for the Eleventh Supreme Judicial District of Texas, upon a final hearing of this cause, reversed the judgment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mingus, Receiver v. WadleyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
- Barron v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Vivier v. Lumbermen's Indemnity Exch.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Cherry v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- March v. Victoria Lloyds Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Phillips Pipe Line Co. v. BrandstetterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Traders' & General Ins. Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Smith v. Traders & General Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.