People v. . Smith
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Hiscock, Ch. J.:
On ample evidence we must assume that the jury found that the defendant broke into the store of one Johnson under circumstances which constituted the crime of burglary in the third degree; that by means of a burglar alarm the proprietor was advised of what was occurring and that he and his son, armed with firearms, quickly proceeded to the store, where they found the defendant still engaged in the commission of his crime; that the latter under threats of death surrendered and the proprietor and his son took him into actual custody, searching him and taking from his possession…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. . NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- People v. . HuterNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- People v. . SchleimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- People v. . MarwigNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- People v. . WaltersNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. MoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Collier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- People v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- People v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- State v. MiraultSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.