Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1981No. 11289PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Manoukian, J.:

The single issue which we discuss is dispositive of this appeal, specifically, whether the trial court abused its discretion in precluding appellant from introducing independent alibi testimony. We hold that it did and, in the context of this case, that such abuse constitutes reversible error.

Appellant, Robert Z. Williams, was tried by jury and found guilty of robbery with the use of a deadly weapon during the commission of a crime. NRS 200.380; 193.165. The evidence showed that the offense was committed at 11:30 p.m. on May 1, 1978.

The record is clear…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Ivan Melchor Moreno and Rigoberto Melchor MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Brown v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Spears v. SpearsNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. WoodardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Evans v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Taliaferro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Maddox v. StoneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Brewery Arts Center v. State Board of ExaminersNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Spilotro v. STATE, EX REL. NEV. GAMING COM'NNevada Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API