Legal Opinion

Mullinax v. Galen-Marshall, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 20, 1994No. 1921324PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COOK, Justice.

Henry and Lona Mullinax appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of Galen-Marshall, Inc., and Louellen Jeong in the Mullinaxes’ action seeking specific performance of a contract to sell real estate. We affirm.

The evidence suggests that in April 1992, Louellen Jeong, president of Galen-Marshall, visited Henry Mullinax, the owner and operator of “Mullinax Auto Sales,” with the intention of borrowing money. She offered to use a parcel of real estate owned by Galen-Marshall as collateral for the loan. In connection with this proposal, she gave Mullinax a copy of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dobson v. DeasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Goodwyn v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nix v. WickSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  2. Min Quin Shao v. CorleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  3. Nix v. WickSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API