Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hamilton v. Baton Rouge Health Care

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 2010No. 2009 CW 0849RPublished

1DissentWhipple, J.

|¶1 respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the Center proved its entitlement to have this matter first submitted to a medical review panel based solely on the allegations of plaintiffs petition, which must be accepted as true for purposes of this exception and which constitute the entirety of the facts upon which *338the decision on the exception must be based, given the Center’s failure to offer any evidence regarding the substance of plaintiffs claims herein to support the exception.

As the Louisiana Supreme Court noted in Richard v. Louisiana Extended Care Centers, Inc.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coleman v. DenoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  2. Richard v. Louisiana Extended Care CentersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  3. Munson v. LAKEWOOD QUARTERS LT. PARTNERSHIPLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API