Legal Opinion

Howard v. Montezuma Fertilizer Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 6, 1925No. 16170PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

Montezuma Fertilizer Company sued J. W. Howard on a promissory note for $10,429.42, besides interest and attorney’s fee. Defendant admitted the execution of the note and notice of claim for attorney’s fee, and assumed the burden of proof; the substance of his plea being as follows: What defendant contracted to buy, and what was actually delivered to him, was 10 tons of acid and 172 tons of 8-4-4 fertilizer, the ingredients of the latter being acid derived from phosphate rock, nitrogen derived from nitrate of soda and cottonseed meal in the proportion of 1% from the former and 3% from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moore v. McAfeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. McGriff v. McGriffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Highway Department v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Spivey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API