Legal Opinion · Dissent

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 6, 1977No. 75-1130Published

1DissentClark, Circuit Judge

The decisive question in both this case and United States v. Mississippi Power & Light Co., 553 F.2d 480 (5th Cir. 1977), which we also decide today, is whether the federal government may impose a substantial contract obligation on a public utility simply because that utility supplies energy to federal installations as required by state law and the terms of its state or municipal franchise. The majority answers in the affirmative. I respectfully disagree.

I

In order to determine whether New Orleans Public Service, Inc. [NOPSI], or Mississippi Power & Light Co. [MP&L] must comply with a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API