Reserve Life Insurance v. Peavy
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.
1. If negotiations are pending between an insurance company and an insured as to the canceling of a policy, but the minds of the parties have not met and a cancellation has not become actually effective at the time a claim arises, the insurance company cannot use the cancellation of the policy as a defense. Home Ins. Co. of New York v. Chattahoochee Lumber Co., 126 Ga. 334 (55 S. E. 11).
2. For a notice to an insured to be the basis of a cancellation of an insurance policy it must positively and unequivocally indicate “. . . to the insured that it is the intention of the company that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sumner v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Home Insurance Co. of New York v. Chattahoochee Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Chambers v. Washington National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
3Cited by7 opinions
- Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. PeavyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Cherokee Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Grayson-Carroll-Wythe Mutual Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1984
- Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. PeavyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. PeavyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.