Legal Opinion
Eliceo Hernandez-Martinez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 11, 2003No. 02-70048, INS A92-440-540PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, petitions for rehearing by the panel, asking the panel to “clarify its decision and specifically remand the case to the Board to determine under which statutory subsection of the Arizona statute Hernandez-Martinez was convicted and whether a conviction under that subsection subjects him to remand.” In support of this request, Ashcroft cites to the Administrative Record.
We have accordingly examined the portions of the A.R. cited. The first, pages 73-74, sets out the admission of Hernandez that he has received the charging document of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Moses Corona-Sanchez, A/K/A Enrique Sanchez-CoronaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Maria Huerta-Guevara v. John D. Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Gilda Altagracia Abreu-Reyes, A.K.A. Gilda A. Desmith v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
3Cited by24 opinions
- Fernandez-Ruiz v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Nancy Arabillas Morales v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Conteh v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Rendon v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Kykhosro Notash v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.