Legal Opinion

Lozada v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 16, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of the New York State Department of Correctional Services dated May 16, 2000, as, in effect, confirmed so much of a determination of a Hearing Officer dated January 26, 2000, made after a Tier III disciplinary hearing, finding that the petitioner violated 7 NYCRR 270.2 (B) (5) (ii) and (iii).

Adjudged that so much of the determination, as, in effect, confirmed so much of the Hearing Officer’s determination finding that the petitioner violated 7 NYCRR 270.2 (B) (5) (ii) and (iii) is confirmed, the petition is denied,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. MTR. OF ABDUR-RAHEEM v. MannNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Torres v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Oro v. KeaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Ng v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Huntley v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mills v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Rincon v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Salvatierra v. WeedenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API