Legal Opinion

Long v. Wade

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 31, 2007No. 1041887 and 1050001Published

1Concurrence 1

The main opinion states that, for purposes of Aspinwallv. Gowens, 405 So.2d 134 (Ala. 1981), "a `count' is ` "a separate and independent claim,"'" 980 So.2d at 386 (emphasis added) (citing Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v.Smith, 719 So.2d 797, 824 (Ala. 1998) (Cook, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part, and quoting Black's LawDictionary 348 (6th ed. 1990))). Based on this standard, I respectfully submit that the jury-charge problem discussed in the main opinion is not a "good count-bad count" problem.

Unlike the main opinion, I conclude that the issue presented pertains to only a single…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Cobb.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Aspinwall v. GowensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Grayco Resources, Inc. v. PooleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. MUTUAL BENEFIT HEALTH & A. ASS'N OF OMAHA v. BullardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  5. King v. WA Brown & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API