Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 7, 1990No. 4-89-0947PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lund

Plaintiff sued defendant railroad company, alleging wilful and wanton acts of negligence. Plaintiff appeals the decision of the trial court granting defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to section 2—615 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 2—615). The issue in this case is whether the complaint sufficiently states a cause of action against the defendant so as to survive a motion to dismiss under section 2—615 of the Code. We hold it does, and we reverse.

On March 14, 1986, plaintiff Allen Eaton filed a complaint alleging negligence against the defendant,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. EicherIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Trout v. Bank of BellevilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Spence v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. McDaniels v. Terminal Railroad Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  5. Zimring v. WendrowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Norfolk and Western Ry. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Miller v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Mostafa v. City of Hickory HillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. Magna Bank of McLean County v. OgilvieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Rodriguez v. Norfolk and Western Ry. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API