Doral II Condominium Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission

Doral II presents an interesting issue for our consideration. Was the Commission’s determination that Doral II unlawfully discriminated against Muriel Zaslow supported by substantial evidence?

Section 5(h)(3.1) of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (PHRA)1 provides in pertinent part:

It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice ... [f]or any person to ... [rjefuse to permit, at the expense of a person with a handicap, reasonable modifications of existing premises occupied or to be occupied by such person if such modifications may be necessary to afford such person full enjoyment of the…