Legal Opinion

Zaremba v. Harbison

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 4, 1985No. 83-2368PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UPON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION AND RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL.

2Per curiam

The procedural aspects of this non-final appeal have been tortuous. Without delineating all of the precedent steps, it appears that the merits of appellees’ Motion to Dismiss Appeal should now be addressed.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. We do not have jurisdiction. Fla.R.App.P. 9.130, and Sgrignuoili v. Barakat, 384 So.2d 657 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

We choose not to treat the appeal as a petition for certiorari as we might do under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chalfonte Development Corp. v. BeaudoinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Powell v. WingardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Sgrignuoili v. BarakatDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Castro v. HidalgoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Towne v. Vaka Law Group, P.L.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API