Armstrong v. Petsche
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Defendants are entitled to dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. The Dram Shop Act does not create a cause of action in favor of one injured as a result of his own intoxicated condition (Sheehy v Big Flats Community Day, 73 NY2d 629, 635; Mitchell v The Shoals, 19 NY2d 338, 340-341). Further, there is no common-law liability on the part of a tavern owner for injuries sustained by a voluntarily intoxi*1080cated patron off the premises, outside the tavern owner’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sheehy v. Big Flats Community Day, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Mitchell v. Shoals, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Wellcome v. Student CooperativeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oursler v. BrennanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Searley v. Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Strassner v. SaleemNew York Supreme Court · 1993