Legal Opinion
State v. Oriole
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 10, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
243 N.J. Super. 688 (1990)
581 A.2d 142
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL J. ORIOLE, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Middlesex County.
Decided August 10, 1990.
Nicholas F. Sewitch Prosecutor for plaintiff (Alan A. Rockoff, Prosecutor of Middlesex County, Attorney).
F. Kevin Lynch for defendant.
HOFFMAN, J.S.C.
The novel issue in this case is whether State v. Tischio, 107 N.J. 504, 527 A.2d 388 (1987) bars extrapolation evidence in prosecutions under The Code of Criminal Justice, Title 2C; more particularly, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1b(1) and -1c. Tischio held that extrapolation…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. TischioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. LaBruttoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- State v. DivelySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- State v. DeLucaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. CurtisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hulmes v. Honda Motor Company, Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- State v. MaraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Smith v. City of TuscaloosaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Wood v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997