Legal Opinion

United States v. Rick Steven Honeycutt

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 7, 1993No. 92-4973PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Opinion of the Court

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:

This case calls upon the court to define the term “knowingly” as used in § 2K1.4(a) of the Sentencing Guidelines. This term must be defined in order to determine whether the district court properly found, for sentencing purposes, that appellant knowingly created a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury while committing the underlying offenses. Under the Guidelines § 2K1.4, Arson: Property Damage by Use of Explosives, a base offense level of 20 is applied if the defendant created a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury, and a base offense level…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Samuel ScrogginsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Francisco Restrepo-Granda, A/K/A Dario Toro GarcesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. DisantoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. RuizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. FarishCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. ManatauCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Gerald AltierCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API