Legal Opinion
Schick v. Park Royal Associates Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided September 17, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, judgment granted to plaintiffs declaring that they are entitled to apply to the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal for a classification of defendant’s building as a hotel or apartment house pursuant to Rent Stabilization Law § YY51-3.1 (a) and (b), and for a determination of the status of plaintiffs’ dwelling units under the Rent Stabilization Law.
This appeal involves the interpretation of New York City’s Rent Stabilization Law (RSL) (Administrative Code of City of New York…
2Cited by4 opinions
- MATTER OF BERKELEY KAY CORP. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Berkeley Kay Corp. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Ansonia Associates v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Benjamin Shapiro Realty Co. v. HensonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1994