Legal Opinion
Caplan v. Latter & Blum, Inc.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided May 14, 1985No. 85-C-0046PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
468 So.2d 1188 (1985)
Dr. Harry B. CAPLAN
v.
LATTER & BLUM, INC.
No. 85-C-0046.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
May 14, 1985.
Rehearing Denied June 6, 1985.
Mitchell J. Hoffman, Susan Stagg Robinson, McCloskey, Dennery, Page & Hennesy, New Orleans, for defendant-applicant.
Irl R. Silverstein, Gretna, for plaintiff-respondent.
WATSON, Justice.
In this dispute over commercial real estate, the issue is whether the plaintiff-lessor, Dr. Harry B. Caplan, unreasonably withheld his consent to a sublease by his lessee, Latter & Blum, Inc.
FACTS
The primary lease between Caplan and Latter was for a term of five years…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Illinois Cent. Gulf R. Co. v. International HarvesterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Gamble v. New Orleans Housing Mart, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Caplan v. Latter & Blum, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
3Cited by10 opinions
- Truschinger v. PakSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Lilawanti Enterprises, Inc. v. Walden Book Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Jones v. LingenfelderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- Fourchon Docks, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Milchem Incorporated and Milpark, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- MacK v. Transport Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.