Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Keeney v. Bland

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1921PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Original proceeding by the State, on the relation of C. F. Keeney and others, against Robert Bland, Judge, for writ of prohibition.

1Opinion of the Court

Poffenbarger, Judge:

By the usual procedure, G. F. Keeney and Fred Mooney, under indictment in Kanawha County and in Logan County for the same offense, being charged in each as accessories before the fact to the crime of murder alleged to have been committed in said last named county, and now in custody by virtue of process issued on the indictment in said first named county, seek a writ of prohibition against the Judge of the Circuit Court of Logan County, to prevent him from proceeding against them, on the indictment pending in his court, upon the theory of concurrent jurisdiction of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. NielsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. In Re SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. McConiha v. GuthrieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Maclean v. SpeedMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Downs v. Lazzelle, JudgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Cunard Steamship Co. v. HudsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. State v. HowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  4. Peora Coal Co. v. AshcraftWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. State Ex Rel. Vanbuskirk v. ConleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API