Legal Opinion
State v. Demott
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided May 21, 1975No. 7418SC961PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant contends that the prostitution statute is unconstitutional on its face for vagueness and overbreadth. G.S. 14-203 defines “prostitution” as follows:
“The term ‘prostitution’ shall be construed to include the offering or receiving of the body for sexual intercourse for hire, and shall also be construed to include the offering or receiving of the body for indiscriminate sexual intercourse without hire. The term ‘assignation’ shall be construed to include the making of any appointment or engagement for prostitution or any act in furtherance of such appointment or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. SalameCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Gilchrist v. HurleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985