Legal Opinion

Warren v. Parkhurst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 3, 1905PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Trial Court, Montgomery County.> Action by John C. Warren against Edward S. Parkhurst and others. From a judgment overruling a demurrer to the complaint, defendants appeal. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.

The plaintiff is the owner of a tract of land abutting upon an artificial canal existing for many years, through which runs a large portion of the waters of' Cayadutta creek flowing through the cities of Gloversville and Johnstown, upon the banks of which are many factories, coloring and tanning mills, which deposit their refuse by sewers into the waters of the creek. This court has decided that this plaintiff stands in the same position that he would if his lands adjoined the creek itself (Warren v. City of Gloversville, 81 App. Div. 291, 80 N. Y. Supp. 912), and in this decision his rights…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strobel v. . Kerr Salt Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Wakeman v. . WilburNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Lockwood Co. v. LawrenceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1885
  4. Hillman v. NewingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Keyes v. Little York Gold Washing & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1879

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of New York v. A-1 Jewelry & Pawn, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Acusport, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  3. NAACP v. AcuSport, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  4. City of New York v. A-1 Jewelry & Pawn, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  5. STATE ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API