Legal Opinion
Mobil Administrative Service Co. v. Mansfield Township
New Jersey Tax Court
Decided May 20, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KUSKIN, J.T.C.
Zeta Consumer Products Corp. (Zeta) has moved, pursuant to R. 4:33-1, to intervene as of right as a party plaintiff in this 1995 local property tax appeal. Plaintiff Mobil Administrative Services Co. (Mobil) and defendant Mansfield Township oppose the motion.
I
On June 1, 1995, Mobil filed a complaint with the Tax Court appealing a judgment of the Warren County Board of Taxation affirming the 1995 property tax assessment on Mobil’s property which is designated as Block 1501, Lot 7 on the Mansfield Township tax map. On January 25,1996, the Tax Court Management Office sent a case…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Busik v. LevineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris PlainsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Harr v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- New Jersey Transit Corp. v. Borough of SomervilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- MacLeod v. City of HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Mobil Administrative Services Co. v. Mansfield TownshipNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Livingston Mall Corp. v. Livingston TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1997
- Zisapel v. Paramus BoroughNew Jersey Tax Court · 2002
- Bordentown Real Estate Associates, LLC v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.