E. A. Tovrea & Co. v. Degnan
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The appellee, City National Bank, in its motion for rehearing complains because we did not in our opinion discuss its contention that, because the complaint in intervention was verified and the answers of garnishee and garnisher thereto were not verified, but were only general denials, it was entitled to judgment under paragraph 477 of the Civil Code of 1913, for the' want of a proper answer to its complaint.
We think it due counsel that we pass on the point made, and that is mainly the reason we now consider it. It is never our purpose intentionally to ignore any debatable question presented…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Mendez v. MoyaArizona Supreme Court · 1939