Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Federal Express

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided May 26, 2026No. 2:24-cv-02927Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ANDERSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:24-cv-02927-BCL-tmp ) FEDERAL EXPRESS, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY The Court is in receipt of Defendant Federal Express’s (“FedEx”) Motion for Certificate of Appealability (Doc. 42) under 28 U.S.C. § 1292. The Motion is DENIED for two reasons. First, Defendant’s motion is premised on a legal issue currently governed by binding precedent, as the Court noted in its Order denying summary judgment. Hope…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kraus v. Board Of County Road Commissioners For The County Of KentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  2. West Tennessee Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. City of MemphisDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2000
  3. United States ex rel. Elliott v. Brickman Group Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  4. In Re Regions Morgan Keegan ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API