Legal Opinion

(HC)Tellez v. Matteson

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 11, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00404Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ELPIDIO D. TELLEZ, No. 2:22-cv-0404 CKD P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 GIGI MATTESON, Warden, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner paid the filing fee. 19 Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court must review all 20 petitions for writ of habeas corpus and summarily dismiss any petition if it is plain that the 21 petitioner is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Fenner v. BoykinSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API