Legal Opinion

Tucker

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 19, 1974PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This purports to be an appeal from an order of a single justice dismissing for lack of a meritorious case (see St. Nicholas Russian Benefit Soc. Inc. v. Yaselko, 279 Mass. 81, 85 [1932]; Board of Health of Franklin v. Hass, 342 Mass. 421, 422-423 [1961]; contrast General Motors Corp., petitioner, 344 Mass. 481, 482-484 [1962]; Fall River, petitioner, 346 Mass. 333, 334-336 [1963]) a petition filed in this court under G. L. c. 211, § 11 (as appearing in St. 1960, c. 207, § 1), for the late entry of a bill of exceptions allowed by the Superior Court. The bill was lost because of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Adamian v. Three Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  2. Carey v. New Yorker of Worcester, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  3. Sweenor v. 162 State Street, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. Barboza v. DecasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Royal Tool & Gauge Corp. v. Clerk of the CourtsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tisei v. Building Inspector of MarlboroughMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API