Legal Opinion

Neuhaus v. Long Island Rail Road Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 8, 1968PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 16, 1967, which enjoined defendant from interfering with plaintiff’s access over a certain grade crossing. Judgment affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, any ambiguity in the deed prepared by defendant, which provides that it shall maintain a “road or farm crossing” over the railroad tracks, must be construed against it (Blackman v. Striker, 142 N. Y. 555, 560). Under the statute existing at the time of the execution of the deed (1869), the railroad was required to maintain a farm crossing even if the deed were silent…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Palmer v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Blackman v. . StrikerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. People v. SutherlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Johnson v. . City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Clarke v. Rochester, Lockport & Niagara Falls RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1854

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Koepp v. HollandDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API