Legal Opinion
Carlos Coffman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 28, 1961No. 6628PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERR, District Judge.
Appellant predicates his appeal on the grounds that there was no judicial determination of his mental competency prior to the trial, that there was insufficient evidence to establish his mental competency at the time of the offense or at the time of the trial, and that the court erred in its instructions with respect to the issue of insanity.
A federal grand jury in the District of Kansas indicted appellant on a charge of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S. C. § 2113 (a, d). On June 17, 1960, he entered a plea of Not Guilty. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 4244, the court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- John Thomas Fitts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Gene A. Krupnick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Mack Kitchens, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Fischer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Wayne S. Marteney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Duane Earl Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Victor Harry Feguer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Thomas W. Whalem v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Dale Estin Birdsell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- David W. Wion v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.