Ex Parte Strickland
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is a child support habeas corpus proceeding. Roy Clifton Strickland was found in contempt for failure to pay court-ordered child support, and incarcerated without either a written judgment of contempt or a written order of commitment. Due process requires both a written judgment of contempt and a written order of commitment in order to punish a person for constructive contempt of court. Ex parte Barnett, 600 S.W.2d 252, 256 (Tex.1980); Ex parte Puckitt, 159 Tex. 438, 322 S.W.2d 597 (1959); see also Ex parte Hardin, 161 Tex. 567, 334 S.W.2d 152 (1961). Both requisites are missing in this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex Parte BarnettTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Ex Parte HardinTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Ex Parte PuckittTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Ex Parte DavilaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ex Parte Littleton, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- In re WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- In Re Richardson, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
- Ex Parte: Andrew Littleton, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- Ex Parte: Matthew Rueben Phillips v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.