Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Strickland

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1987No. C-6106PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a child support habeas corpus proceeding. Roy Clifton Strickland was found in contempt for failure to pay court-ordered child support, and incarcerated without either a written judgment of contempt or a written order of commitment. Due process requires both a written judgment of contempt and a written order of commitment in order to punish a person for constructive contempt of court. Ex parte Barnett, 600 S.W.2d 252, 256 (Tex.1980); Ex parte Puckitt, 159 Tex. 438, 322 S.W.2d 597 (1959); see also Ex parte Hardin, 161 Tex. 567, 334 S.W.2d 152 (1961). Both requisites are missing in this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BarnettTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Ex Parte HardinTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Ex Parte PuckittTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Ex Parte DavilaTexas Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Littleton, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  2. In re WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. In Re Richardson, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
  4. Ex Parte: Andrew Littleton, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  5. Ex Parte: Matthew Rueben Phillips v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API