Legal Opinion

Gratrix v. Pine Tree, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1984No. 7797PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*1265OPINION

2Per curiam

The appellants’ sole argument in this case is that the appellee-plaintiff’s complaint should have been dismissed because at the time the lawsuit was filed the plaintiff, a foreign corporation, did not possess a certificate of authority, as required by AS 10.05.690,1 and did not plead and prove compliance with AS 10.05.720.2

We find the appellants’ arguments without merit.

Pine Tree, Inc., a Panamanian corporation, filed a complaint on January 8, 1980, seeking $251,500 from Kris Gratrix and Raymond Hartlieb on a defaulted note in the same amount. The complaint did not aver that Pine Tree…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alaska Mines & Minerals, Inc. v. Alaska Industrial BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Parker v. Lin-Co Producing CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1967
  3. King v. Petroleum Services CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. E. C. Vogt, Inc. v. Ganley Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Richardson Vista Corp. v. City of AnchorageDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blake v. GilbertAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API