Gratrix v. Pine Tree, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*1265OPINION
2Per curiam
The appellants’ sole argument in this case is that the appellee-plaintiff’s complaint should have been dismissed because at the time the lawsuit was filed the plaintiff, a foreign corporation, did not possess a certificate of authority, as required by AS 10.05.690,1 and did not plead and prove compliance with AS 10.05.720.2
We find the appellants’ arguments without merit.
Pine Tree, Inc., a Panamanian corporation, filed a complaint on January 8, 1980, seeking $251,500 from Kris Gratrix and Raymond Hartlieb on a defaulted note in the same amount. The complaint did not aver that Pine Tree…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Alaska Mines & Minerals, Inc. v. Alaska Industrial BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1960
- Parker v. Lin-Co Producing CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1967
- King v. Petroleum Services CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- E. C. Vogt, Inc. v. Ganley Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Richardson Vista Corp. v. City of AnchorageDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Blake v. GilbertAlaska Supreme Court · 1985