Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

The Door Shop, Inc. v. Alcorn County Electric Power Association

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 2018No. 2017-CA-00956-SCTPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

KING, JUSTICE, CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART:

¶ 30. Although I agree with the majority's conclusion that the Mississippi Public Service Commission (MPSC) lacked jurisdiction in this case, I respectfully disagree with the majority's statement in footnote 7 that The Door Shop failed to raise Mississippi Code Section 15-1-5 as an affirmative defense. The Alcorn County Electric Power Association (ACE) filed its complaint on January 17, 2014. The Door Shop filed its answer on May 28, 2014, in which it stated, "Defendant pleads all applicable Statute of Limitations." Subsequently, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gerald W. Scafidi v. Jo Ann S. HilleMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Brown v. Walton Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API