Legal Opinion · Dissent

Postlewait Construction, Inc. v. Great American Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 12, 1985No. 6504-9-IIIPublished

1DissentThompson, J.

(dissenting)—I dissent from the majority holding that Postlewait Construction Co. is not an intended third party beneficiary under the insurance policy and is, therefore, precluded from pursuing its claim against Great American Insurance Companies. For the reasons which follow I would reverse the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the insurer.

The majority concludes Postlewait was not an intended third party beneficiary because Great American did not expressly assume a direct obligation to Postlewait. The majority would limit the inquiry to the insurer's intent to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burke & Thomas, Inc. v. International Organization of MastersWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Grand Lodge of Scandinavian Fraternity of America, District No. 7 v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Stewart-Smith Haidinger, Inc. v. Avi-Truck, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hertz Equip. Rent. Corp. v. Homer Knost Const. Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Whittington v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API