Legal Opinion

Crenshawe v. Pearce

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 12, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Admiralty. Action upon three bills of lading for failure to transport 559 bales of cotton by steamer Arizona.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The libelants, in September, 1887, received from Under-hill & Co., in this city, three bills of lading, reciting the shipment of 848 bales of cotton on board the steam-ship Arizona, for Liverpool, dated August 31st, September 1st, and September 2d. She sailed on Tuesday, September 6th. Only 289 bales went by the Arizona. The re■maining 559 bales were carried by the Wisconsin, of the same line, which left a week later, and arrived in Liverpool about 10 days after the Arizona. During this interval there was a fall of three-eighths of a penny per pound in the market price of cotton, to recover…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pollard v. VintonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. The Lady FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Fowler v. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. The SaragossaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1868

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nichimen Company, Inc. v. M. v. Farland, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and A/s Vigra, Defendants-Appellants-Appellees v. Seaboard Shipping Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. Strohmeyer & Arpe Co. v. American Line S. S. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  3. Darragh v. The DunbrittonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
  4. Omaha Elevator Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  5. The Citta Di PalermoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API