Martin v. Scaife
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Justice.
The legal issue presented here concerns whether a defendant who has been found liable for damage to a plaintiff’s automobile as the result of an automobile accident, has a right to offset the amount of repair expenses paid by the defendant’s automobile insurer against the amount of damages awarded the plaintiff by a jury.
On July 13, 1989, Neal Martin and Le-nelle Scaife were involved in an automobile accident. As a result of this accident, Scaife sued Martin, seeking damages to compensate for the damage sustained to her car during the accident. In an amended answer, Martin…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mobile Light R. Co. v. GadikSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Birmingham R. L. & P. Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Hill Grocery Co. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Keating v. Contractors Tire Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Alford v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lovelace v. WebsterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- Dudley v. AndersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Dudley v. AndersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Wharf Retail Properties, LLC v. Landmark American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2024