Legal Opinion

Martin v. Scaife

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 13, 1991No. 1900515PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

The legal issue presented here concerns whether a defendant who has been found liable for damage to a plaintiff’s automobile as the result of an automobile accident, has a right to offset the amount of repair expenses paid by the defendant’s automobile insurer against the amount of damages awarded the plaintiff by a jury.

On July 13, 1989, Neal Martin and Le-nelle Scaife were involved in an automobile accident. As a result of this accident, Scaife sued Martin, seeking damages to compensate for the damage sustained to her car during the accident. In an amended answer, Martin…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mobile Light R. Co. v. GadikSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Birmingham R. L. & P. Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Hill Grocery Co. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Keating v. Contractors Tire Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Alford v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lovelace v. WebsterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  2. Dudley v. AndersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  3. Dudley v. AndersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. Wharf Retail Properties, LLC v. Landmark American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API