Legal Opinion

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bagg

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 13, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

In 1920 the plaintiff by contract in writing engaged one Albert Flower, an expert accountant and tax specialist, to aid the plaintiff in recovering from the United States a large sum which the plaintiff claimed as an over*126payment of taxes. In 1923 Flower brought an action at law against the plaintiff for breach of this contract by the plaintiff and in 1933 he recovered judgment in said action in the amount of $129,412.50. In the meantime Flower had assigned his contract to a corporation known as Albert Flower Inc. He or the corporation had also assigned his or its beneficial interest…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Salem Trust Co. v. Manufacturers' Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Check v. KaplanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Putnam v. StoryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  4. Graustein v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Fairbanks v. . SargentNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Birnbaum v. PamoukisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Goldston v. RandolphMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. First National Bank v. Pomona Tile Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. Linse v. O'MEARAMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Harvard Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API