Legal Opinion

Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided January 20, 2026No. 4:22-cv-04112Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION BUERGOFOL GMBH, 4:22-CV-04112-KES Plaintiff and Counter Defendant, vs. ORDER ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OMEGA LINER COMPANY, INC., Defendant and Counter Claimant. This case involves claims by plaintiff, Buergofol, of alleged infringement of U.S Patent No. 8,794,269 (‘269 Patent) by defendant, Omega. Docket 163 at 16-21. Pending before the court are the parties’ dueling constructions of certain terms in claim 1 of the ‘269 Patent. See Docket 553-1 at 1-4; Docket 868; Docket 869. Following a claim construction hearing, see…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  5. 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API